⏳ skin longevity stack · NAD+ + GHK-Cu for the long game
if u're 25+ and thinking 'i want to look like this at 35,' the protocol shifts from 'fix today' to 'maintain forever.' NAD+ + GHK-Cu is the long-game stack. they hit cellular renewal + structural protein synthesis · the two things that age out first. running this for 2 years now 💖
the stack
NAD+ · 100mg subq · twice weekly · evening.
GHK-Cu · 1mg subq · daily · morning.
no other peptides · isolate ur baseline.
what each one does
NAD+ · feeds sirtuin activity. SIRT1 + SIRT3 drive mitochondrial health and DNA repair. when NAD+ drops with age, both stall. supplementing keeps them running.
GHK-Cu · drives structural protein synthesis. without active collagen + elastin synthesis, skin thins. doesn't matter how good ur cells are if the architecture collapses.
together · cell health + structural maintenance. the only stack i'd run for 5+ years.
quick answers
is NAD+ really worth it?
controversial in longevity world but the skin-side data is decent. i can feel it in week 1 (energy + sleep) and see it in week 6 (skin dullness gone).
oral NAD+ precursors vs injectable?
injectable NAD+ has higher bioavailability. NMN/NR oral are precursors u have to convert. if budget allows, injectable.
research reference
compound deep-dives on peppudex · evidence grades + mechanism + sources:
also in the diary
what i actually use 💖
source on peppu.studio →research-use only · everything below is for laboratory use, not for human consumption · diary content reflects research-protocol logs, not medical advice 💖